Finance Municipal Credit Ratings Methodology

1.0
Methodology Version
2026-03-01
Last Updated

Score To Rating Map - Aaa

Max Score10
DescriptionExtremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Aa+

Max Score18
DescriptionVery strong capacity; minimal hazard exposure
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Aa

Max Score25
DescriptionVery strong capacity; low hazard exposure
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Aa-

Max Score32
DescriptionVery strong capacity; moderate-low hazard exposure
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - A+

Max Score38
DescriptionStrong capacity; some hazard sensitivity
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - A

Max Score44
DescriptionStrong capacity; moderate hazard sensitivity
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - A-

Max Score50
DescriptionStrong capacity; notable hazard sensitivity
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Bbb+

Max Score56
DescriptionAdequate capacity; material hazard exposure
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Bbb

Max Score62
DescriptionAdequate capacity; significant hazard exposure
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Bbb-

Max Score68
DescriptionAdequate capacity; high hazard exposure (investment grade floor)
Investment GradeTrue

Score To Rating Map - Bb+

Max Score74
DescriptionSpeculative; elevated hazard or fiscal stress
Investment GradeFalse

Score To Rating Map - Bb

Max Score80
DescriptionSpeculative; significant vulnerability
Investment GradeFalse

Score To Rating Map - B+

Max Score85
DescriptionHighly speculative; major hazard concentration
Investment GradeFalse

Score To Rating Map - B

Max Score90
DescriptionHighly speculative; extreme hazard exposure
Investment GradeFalse

Score To Rating Map - Ccc

Max Score95
DescriptionSubstantial risk; dependent on favorable conditions
Investment GradeFalse

Score To Rating Map - Cc

Max Score100
DescriptionNear-default; active hazard or fiscal crisis
Investment GradeFalse

Component Weights - Geohazard Exposure

Weight0.3
DescriptionMulti-hazard composite from 8 natural hazard types. Uses weighted-max algorithm: dominant hazard score + 0.3 * mean of remaining hazards. Flood receives highest weight (1.0) for municipal credit due to infrastructure and tax base impact.

Component Weights - Fiscal Resilience

Weight0.25
DescriptionDebt-to-revenue ratio, reserve fund adequacy, tax base diversity, and population trends. Actual financials used when provided; otherwise estimated from regional benchmarks.

Component Weights - Infrastructure Stress

Weight0.18
DescriptionEstimated water main age, road condition, bridge deficiency rate, and stormwater capacity. Aged infrastructure amplifies hazard vulnerability and capital expenditure pressure.

Component Weights - Climate Vulnerability

Weight0.12
DescriptionSea level rise exposure, heat stress, drought risk, and precipitation change. Forward-looking assessment based on IPCC AR6 projections under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios.

Component Weights - Climate Migration

Weight0.08
DescriptionNet migration direction and 10-year population change projection driven by climate desirability factors. Outflows erode tax base; inflows increase demand pressure.

Component Weights - Insurance Burden

Weight0.07
DescriptionPer-capita hazard insurance estimate and trend. Rising insurance costs signal market recognition of risk and threaten property values and affordability.

Hazard Types And Weights - Flood

Weight1
Rank1

Hazard Types And Weights - Hurricane

Weight0.95
Rank2

Hazard Types And Weights - Wildfire

Weight0.9
Rank3

Hazard Types And Weights - Earthquake

Weight0.85
Rank4

Hazard Types And Weights - Tornado

Weight0.8
Rank5

Hazard Types And Weights - Sinkhole

Weight0.75
Rank6

Hazard Types And Weights - Landslide

Weight0.7
Rank7

Hazard Types And Weights - Volcanic

Weight0.5
Rank8

Data Sources

DeepMap GeoRisk Composite (8-component multi-hazard), US Census Bureau (population, demographics, trends), Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) -- regional economics, ASCE Infrastructure Report Card (condition benchmarks), IPCC AR6 WG1 (climate projections, SSP scenarios), DeepMap Climate Migration Model (proprietary), FEMA NFIP (flood insurance participation, claims), DeepMap Weather Intelligence (Open-Meteo, GloFAS, NWS, NWPS, SWDI), USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, NOAA Severe Weather Data Inventory

Limitations

Scores are modeled estimates, not direct financial analysis, Infrastructure age is estimated from regional averages, not asset inventories, Climate projections carry inherent uncertainty, Fiscal data is estimated unless actual budget/debt figures are provided, Not a substitute for a formal credit rating from S&P, Moody's, or Fitch, US-focused methodology; international municipalities require adaptation

Pricing

Endpointratings-methodology
Cost Usd0
Cost Cents0

Raw JSON