Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Aa+
Max Score
18
Description
Very strong capacity; minimal hazard exposure
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Aa
Max Score
25
Description
Very strong capacity; low hazard exposure
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Aa-
Max Score
32
Description
Very strong capacity; moderate-low hazard exposure
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - A+
Max Score
38
Description
Strong capacity; some hazard sensitivity
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - A
Max Score
44
Description
Strong capacity; moderate hazard sensitivity
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - A-
Max Score
50
Description
Strong capacity; notable hazard sensitivity
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Bbb+
Max Score
56
Description
Adequate capacity; material hazard exposure
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Bbb
Max Score
62
Description
Adequate capacity; significant hazard exposure
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Bbb-
Max Score
68
Description
Adequate capacity; high hazard exposure (investment grade floor)
Investment Grade
True
Score To Rating Map - Bb+
Max Score
74
Description
Speculative; elevated hazard or fiscal stress
Investment Grade
False
Score To Rating Map - Bb
Max Score
80
Description
Speculative; significant vulnerability
Investment Grade
False
Score To Rating Map - B+
Max Score
85
Description
Highly speculative; major hazard concentration
Investment Grade
False
Score To Rating Map - B
Max Score
90
Description
Highly speculative; extreme hazard exposure
Investment Grade
False
Score To Rating Map - Ccc
Max Score
95
Description
Substantial risk; dependent on favorable conditions
Investment Grade
False
Score To Rating Map - Cc
Max Score
100
Description
Near-default; active hazard or fiscal crisis
Investment Grade
False
Component Weights - Geohazard Exposure
Weight
0.3
Description
Multi-hazard composite from 8 natural hazard types. Uses weighted-max algorithm: dominant hazard score + 0.3 * mean of remaining hazards. Flood receives highest weight (1.0) for municipal credit due to infrastructure and tax base impact.
Component Weights - Fiscal Resilience
Weight
0.25
Description
Debt-to-revenue ratio, reserve fund adequacy, tax base diversity, and population trends. Actual financials used when provided; otherwise estimated from regional benchmarks.
Component Weights - Infrastructure Stress
Weight
0.18
Description
Estimated water main age, road condition, bridge deficiency rate, and stormwater capacity. Aged infrastructure amplifies hazard vulnerability and capital expenditure pressure.
Component Weights - Climate Vulnerability
Weight
0.12
Description
Sea level rise exposure, heat stress, drought risk, and precipitation change. Forward-looking assessment based on IPCC AR6 projections under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios.
Component Weights - Climate Migration
Weight
0.08
Description
Net migration direction and 10-year population change projection driven by climate desirability factors. Outflows erode tax base; inflows increase demand pressure.
Component Weights - Insurance Burden
Weight
0.07
Description
Per-capita hazard insurance estimate and trend. Rising insurance costs signal market recognition of risk and threaten property values and affordability.
Hazard Types And Weights - Flood
Weight
1
Rank
1
Hazard Types And Weights - Hurricane
Weight
0.95
Rank
2
Hazard Types And Weights - Wildfire
Weight
0.9
Rank
3
Hazard Types And Weights - Earthquake
Weight
0.85
Rank
4
Hazard Types And Weights - Tornado
Weight
0.8
Rank
5
Hazard Types And Weights - Sinkhole
Weight
0.75
Rank
6
Hazard Types And Weights - Landslide
Weight
0.7
Rank
7
Hazard Types And Weights - Volcanic
Weight
0.5
Rank
8
Data Sources
DeepMap GeoRisk Composite (8-component multi-hazard), US Census Bureau (population, demographics, trends), Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) -- regional economics, ASCE Infrastructure Report Card (condition benchmarks), IPCC AR6 WG1 (climate projections, SSP scenarios), DeepMap Climate Migration Model (proprietary), FEMA NFIP (flood insurance participation, claims), DeepMap Weather Intelligence (Open-Meteo, GloFAS, NWS, NWPS, SWDI), USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, NOAA Severe Weather Data Inventory
Limitations
Scores are modeled estimates, not direct financial analysis, Infrastructure age is estimated from regional averages, not asset inventories, Climate projections carry inherent uncertainty, Fiscal data is estimated unless actual budget/debt figures are provided, Not a substitute for a formal credit rating from S&P, Moody's, or Fitch, US-focused methodology; international municipalities require adaptation
Pricing
Endpoint
ratings-methodology
Cost Usd
0
Cost Cents
0
Raw JSON
{
"methodology_version": "1.0",
"last_updated": "2026-03-01",
"title": "DeepMap AI Municipal Credit Intelligence Methodology",
"overview": "The DeepMap Municipal Credit Intelligence engine produces a physics-informed credit risk score (0-100) that maps to an S&P-equivalent implied rating. Unlike traditional credit analysis that relies primarily on financial statements, this methodology integrates actual geophysical hazard exposure, infrastructure condition, climate vulnerability, migration trends, and insurance market dynamics to produce a holistic credit assessment.",
"score_to_rating_map": {
"AAA": {
"max_score": 10.0,
"description": "Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments",
"investment_grade": true
},
"AA+": {
"max_score": 18.0,
"description": "Very strong capacity; minimal hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": true
},
"AA": {
"max_score": 25.0,
"description": "Very strong capacity; low hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": true
},
"AA-": {
"max_score": 32.0,
"description": "Very strong capacity; moderate-low hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": true
},
"A+": {
"max_score": 38.0,
"description": "Strong capacity; some hazard sensitivity",
"investment_grade": true
},
"A": {
"max_score": 44.0,
"description": "Strong capacity; moderate hazard sensitivity",
"investment_grade": true
},
"A-": {
"max_score": 50.0,
"description": "Strong capacity; notable hazard sensitivity",
"investment_grade": true
},
"BBB+": {
"max_score": 56.0,
"description": "Adequate capacity; material hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": true
},
"BBB": {
"max_score": 62.0,
"description": "Adequate capacity; significant hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": true
},
"BBB-": {
"max_score": 68.0,
"description": "Adequate capacity; high hazard exposure (investment grade floor)",
"investment_grade": true
},
"BB+": {
"max_score": 74.0,
"description": "Speculative; elevated hazard or fiscal stress",
"investment_grade": false
},
"BB": {
"max_score": 80.0,
"description": "Speculative; significant vulnerability",
"investment_grade": false
},
"B+": {
"max_score": 85.0,
"description": "Highly speculative; major hazard concentration",
"investment_grade": false
},
"B": {
"max_score": 90.0,
"description": "Highly speculative; extreme hazard exposure",
"investment_grade": false
},
"CCC": {
"max_score": 95.0,
"description": "Substantial risk; dependent on favorable conditions",
"investment_grade": false
},
"CC": {
"max_score": 100.0,
"description": "Near-default; active hazard or fiscal crisis",
"investment_grade": false
}
},
"component_weights": {
"geohazard_exposure": {
"weight": 0.3,
"description": "Multi-hazard composite from 8 natural hazard types. Uses weighted-max algorithm: dominant hazard score + 0.3 * mean of remaining hazards. Flood receives highest weight (1.0) for municipal credit due to infrastructure and tax base impact."
},
"fiscal_resilience": {
"weight": 0.25,
"description": "Debt-to-revenue ratio, reserve fund adequacy, tax base diversity, and population trends. Actual financials used when provided; otherwise estimated from regional benchmarks."
},
"infrastructure_stress": {
"weight": 0.18,
"description": "Estimated water main age, road condition, bridge deficiency rate, and stormwater capacity. Aged infrastructure amplifies hazard vulnerability and capital expenditure pressure."
},
"climate_vulnerability": {
"weight": 0.12,
"description": "Sea level rise exposure, heat stress, drought risk, and precipitation change. Forward-looking assessment based on IPCC AR6 projections under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios."
},
"climate_migration": {
"weight": 0.08,
"description": "Net migration direction and 10-year population change projection driven by climate desirability factors. Outflows erode tax base; inflows increase demand pressure."
},
"insurance_burden": {
"weight": 0.07,
"description": "Per-capita hazard insurance estimate and trend. Rising insurance costs signal market recognition of risk and threaten property values and affordability."
}
},
"hazard_types_and_weights": {
"flood": {
"weight": 1.0,
"rank": 1
},
"hurricane": {
"weight": 0.95,
"rank": 2
},
"wildfire": {
"weight": 0.9,
"rank": 3
},
"earthquake": {
"weight": 0.85,
"rank": 4
},
"tornado": {
"weight": 0.8,
"rank": 5
},
"sinkhole": {
"weight": 0.75,
"rank": 6
},
"landslide": {
"weight": 0.7,
"rank": 7
},
"volcanic": {
"weight": 0.5,
"rank": 8
}
},
"data_sources": [
"DeepMap GeoRisk Composite (8-component multi-hazard)",
"US Census Bureau (population, demographics, trends)",
"Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) -- regional economics",
"ASCE Infrastructure Report Card (condition benchmarks)",
"IPCC AR6 WG1 (climate projections, SSP scenarios)",
"DeepMap Climate Migration Model (proprietary)",
"FEMA NFIP (flood insurance participation, claims)",
"DeepMap Weather Intelligence (Open-Meteo, GloFAS, NWS, NWPS, SWDI)",
"USGS Earthquake Hazards Program",
"NOAA Severe Weather Data Inventory"
],
"climate_scenarios": {
"SSP2-4.5": {
"2030": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.08,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.1,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.05,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.12,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 8,
"drought_multiplier": 1.06
},
"2040": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.18,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.22,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.1,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.25,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 18,
"drought_multiplier": 1.14
},
"2050": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.3,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.38,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.18,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.42,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 30,
"drought_multiplier": 1.25
}
},
"SSP5-8.5": {
"2030": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.12,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.15,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.08,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.18,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 12,
"drought_multiplier": 1.1
},
"2040": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.3,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.4,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.2,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.45,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 28,
"drought_multiplier": 1.28
},
"2050": {
"flood_multiplier": 1.55,
"wildfire_multiplier": 1.72,
"hurricane_multiplier": 1.35,
"heat_stress_multiplier": 1.8,
"sea_level_rise_cm": 50,
"drought_multiplier": 1.48
}
}
},
"limitations": [
"Scores are modeled estimates, not direct financial analysis",
"Infrastructure age is estimated from regional averages, not asset inventories",
"Climate projections carry inherent uncertainty",
"Fiscal data is estimated unless actual budget/debt figures are provided",
"Not a substitute for a formal credit rating from S&P, Moody's, or Fitch",
"US-focused methodology; international municipalities require adaptation"
],
"update_frequency": "Hazard data refreshed daily; methodology reviewed quarterly",
"pricing": {
"endpoint": "ratings-methodology",
"cost_usd": 0.0,
"cost_cents": 0
}
}